tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-52912413020249030.post4540309737149109219..comments2024-03-12T11:58:24.510+13:00Comments on Otagosh: Barth - the Enigma (der zweite Teil)Gavin Rhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17965552923012880262noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-52912413020249030.post-50768620831476087972015-04-24T04:49:58.206+12:002015-04-24T04:49:58.206+12:00A cursory look into Karl Barth has left me hopeles...A cursory look into Karl Barth has left me hopelessly confused in ignorance. I will probably be very wrong in any opinion I express about this topic.<br /><br />As nearly as I can tell, much of the confusion is that Karl Barth has declared that the Bible is not inerrant, but the important thing is Jesus. Is this correct?<br /><br />To me this seems to be muddled thinking and I would not be surprised that people have a hard time grasping what he has to say -- and maybe because it doesn't make any real logical sense? (We've already discussed <a href="http://hwarmstrong.com/wordpress/2015/04/17/hillary-clinton-antichrist/" rel="nofollow">the difficulties in discussing Google Translate</a>.)<br /><br />At this point in this discussion about Christian Theology and theologians, I guess we could congratulate Christians for being so kind and merciful that they are willing to completely forgive the Jews for murdering a person who never existed.<br /><br />Does this pretty much sum up modern Christian Theology?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com