Saturday, 2 April 2011

A cautious Stepp in the right direction?

Grace Communion International has offered a cautious endorsement of Love Wins by Rob Bell. GCI pastor Jonathan Stepp (Good News Fellowship, Nashville, TN.) seems to like what he reads.
The first very good aspect of Bell’s book is that he asks excellent questions. “What happens to a 15 year-old atheist who dies in a car wreck?” “Can someone dogmatically say that Gandhi is in hell?” “Did Jesus come to save us from God?” He is asking all the right questions: the questions the world is asking – both implicitly and explicitly – of modern, American evangelical theology.

The second very good aspect of Bell’s book is that he offers excellent, Bible-based answers to these questions. The book is filled with quotes from the Scriptures and he interprets these verses correctly, in a Christ-centered way.

The net result is a very good book. A book that raises profound questions that most Christians in America need to think about and a book that points its readers to answers rooted in the Biblical witness of who God is.
But, wouldn't you know it, Rob would have done a much better job if he'd done obeisance to Baxter Kruger.
Conspicuously absent are some of the greats of Christian History: Irenaeus of Lyon, Athanasius of Alexandria, Gregory of Nyssa, Karl Barth, T.F. Torrance, and Baxter Kruger just to name a few.
Jonathan has put together an interesting list of 'grates.' I mean, Torrance and Kruger "are some of the greats of Christian History"? Really? Who'd have thunked it!

Stepp may also have explained why he has caught the rare Kruger Babbling Disease.
Maybe I’m wrong, but my own experience – and my experience reading theologians like Barth and Torrance – tells me that when you have drunk deeply from the well of the Fathers (or from the water buckets of those who have, like Kruger) you can no longer just talk about “God and Jesus” as Bell does. Something changes inside you. Your mind is baptized into the Triune Life in such a way that it dyes the very color of your thinking. You no longer think, as Bell does, about what God is like and what Jesus said about God. You think of the glorious riches of the Father poured out on humanity through the flesh and blood of his Son Jesus Christ and enjoyed by all in the love of the Holy Spirit.
What was Barth smoking?
Oh ick! Jonathan, regardless of the pictures you've seen of Barth, you're meant to read books, not smoke 'em!

Across at the Surprising God blog, pretty much an official mouthpiece for GCI, Ted Johnson gives his imprimatur to the Stepp article, concluding his piece; "And as Rob Bell helpfully notes, love wins!

It deeply disturbs me to be - apart from the goofy trinitarian schmaltz - on more or less the same page as Ted and Jonathan, but I doubt it'll happen again any time soon.

3 comments:

  1. "...You no longer think, as Bell does, about what God is like and what Jesus said about God.

    Theologians are a lot like computer programmers. They seem to enjoy getting lost in the arcane nuances of the theory of things to the point that nobody outside their small circle knows what the hell they are talking about.

    Left unanswered is why their theology has Jesus rescuing man from God. The God Jesus speaks in intimate terms as the "Abba" Father.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "...my experience reading theologians like Barth and Torrance...

    ...to the exclusion of ever picking up, let alone opening, let alone actually preaching from, that particular collection of books known as The Holy Bible."


    Finished that for you, Jon.

    Gavin, you agree with that slapstick? Which part? The bit about "drinking from the water buckets of those who have drunk deeply from the wells of the [Pagans]?" Or the "Your mind is baptized into the Triune life [barf] in such a way that it dyes the very color of your thinking?" I'll bet it "dies" it all right...any more brain cells poor old Jon can kill by idolizing the words of men without ever touching his Bible?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm on the same page regarding the wideness of salvation - however you want to interpret that - and that God's grace - however you want to interpret that - is not limited by whatever propositional truths are (or are not) currently found inside your head.

    ReplyDelete